fix the hackshield so no one can hack

[MVP+]

I am sure some of mods even sent the hack program. what's next move? If you guys can provide us hack-free tournament which seems like never happening these days, you will have players coming back to this dying game. Try ban hacking.

[Milks]

그건 아이러니하다.

[Anaksha]

If you hack the Vatican server, have you tampered in God's domain?

[MVP+]

Three replies so far are all trolls. wonderful.

[Roarless]

ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

[Anaksha]

Three replies so far are all trolls. wonderful.

But Gamekiss troll us since the beginning.

[ShrimpMan]

LOL GK wont fix sht litteraly xigncode3 AC is otter trash

[Valioa]

R e m o v e x i g n c o d e

[Beef]

Everything happens for a reason. Have faith and let God guide you.

"I will instruct you and teach you in the way you should go; I will counsel you with my loving eye on you." -Psalm 32:8

[Beef]

I am sure some of mods even sent the hack program. what's next move? If you guys can provide us hack-free tournament which seems like never happening these days, you will have players coming back to this dying game. Try ban hacking.

The developers could time stamp the arrival of player action packets (such as rebounds). Alongside of that, keep records of lowest packet travel time from the client. 'Player A' has a lowest travel time of 60ms (milliseconds) and their action packets were received first. 'Player B' has a lowest travel time of 20ms, but their action packets were received later than 'Player A'. Wait.. something doesn't add up.. maybe 'Player B' just reacted later. Ok, let's log this occurrence. BUT wait.. 'Player A's' logs has this occurrence repeatedly? (even against veterans with an account creation date >2 years)

..Maybe they are speeding up their game process in order to send action packets before their opponent client(s) to compensate for their high ping disadvantage?..

But you know, why bother.. ($$)

[Cadette]

The developers could time stamp the arrival of player action packets (such as rebounds). Alongside of that, keep records of lowest packet travel time from the client. 'Player A' has a lowest travel time of 60ms (milliseconds) and their action packets were received first. 'Player B' has a lowest travel time of 20ms, but their action packets were received later than 'Player A'. Wait.. something doesn't add up.. maybe 'Player B' just reacted later. Ok, let's log this occurrence. BUT wait.. 'Player A's' logs has this occurrence repeatedly? (even against veterans with an account creation date >2 years)

..Maybe they are speeding up their game process in order to send action packets before their opponent client(s) to compensate for their high ping disadvantage?..

But you know, why bother.. ($$)

u wat m8..