Swing Man BUFF! (Did Gk DROP SW 3pt even more recently???!!!)

[Glow]

SF mid doesnt need to be touched o.O dear god did i just read this.Anyone who says that SF should score better then DG especially 3s is a total basketball noob to me,period.Swingman is SG/SF hybrid and that being said it need to have close 3 to SG and close mid to SF,and not worse 3 then SF and worse mid then SG,absolute BS,you can say what you want,but in reality DG is much better scorer then SF and that should be too in this game.SF is meant to score closer to basket and 3 when open and not in the face of enemy.NERF SF,BOOST DG AND SW.

What?!?!? DG should not have better mid than sf. dg is a mix of a sg and pg they supposed be able to pass and score when needed not be the first scoring option. And there's nothing really wrong with SW y'all jus playing it like it's a sg wanting to chuck up 3s and making them 75% of the time. It's a SWINGMAN not a 3pt specialist. Attack the paint and shoot mids and have shoot 3s if necessary.

[Kevin]

.... in most teams small forwards are either the first for second choice to score but it depends on the team game plan. And sw is like a slasher. If you played 2K17 you see that slashers have good dribble attributes , low shooting attributes and high layup attributes. If anything gamekiss should boost sw speed. And if a sf is making 3s in your face your defense is just bad then. All your post is based on groundless statements and personal feelings about small forwards.

Ion know about GOOD. Max is 80 Ball Control (85 with boosts), like 80 speed with the ball and gets ripped ez as fuck. And their shooting stats are actually a bit good. If you factor in shooting off dribble. Literally just shy of shot creators in that aspect.

Anyways back to the original topic at hand. SWs shouldn't exist. These hybrid positions break the game.

[Sanctify]

Sooo my defense is bad,ok.thats your argument,thats what you say to me.Im not here to defend SW imo,but to defend DG,there is no normal reason for SF to have more chance to make 3 in face then DG,you can say what you want but thats the fact.Imnot against SF having more chance to make midshot but 3?Cmon lets be honest,in reality SFs 3s are nowhere near DGs.And yes im having personal feelings towards SF but i wont say whats on my mind cause i would get banned,but be honest and say do you have personal feelings towards SF like i do,just inverted?

All it really is mostly is being able to contest at the right time depending on the height of your player.. most SFs are treated like SGs and are played really closely so they don't shoot 3s as much unless i were to overhelp.. these hybrid positions such as SW and DG aren't really suppose to have that much of an advantage over the regular positions because it's a mix of two so it has its own strengths.. would it be nice to 3 consistently yes but for DG and SW 3 point shots aren't suppose to be taken in abundance in those positions

[elBelgrado]

All it really is mostly is being able to contest at the right time depending on the height of your player.. most SFs are treated like SGs and are played really closely so they don't shoot 3s as much unless i were to overhelp.. these hybrid positions such as SW and DG aren't really suppose to have that much of an advantage over the regular positions because it's a mix of two so it has its own strengths.. would it be nice to 3 consistently yes but for DG and SW 3 point shots aren't suppose to be taken in abundance in those positions

Why i have 230 3pt if im not made for 3 shots,sp5 super pro deck,dasher.Yesterday my friends and i had 20 win streak,and at the end of the game we were losing by 2 i was left all alone on 3 1 second before end.I had no mark shot equipped and .... i missed.I just couldnt beleive,my sp5 failed at worst moment.Once with my dg i missed no mark midshot buzzer,and so many missed pullup midshot buzzers(not contested or in the face),and i hv 210 midshot,more then most SFs.How the **** they score better then i do,im gonna burn my account,all sort of people tell me i dont know how to defend,yet im 4 times semi finalist in EU,50 all rounder.SFs are being played by biggest nabs in this game,they keep abusing midshot and 3 shots.this is getting really personal.

[Sanctify]

Why i have 230 3pt if im not made for 3 shots,sp5 super pro deck,dasher.Yesterday my friends and i had 20 win streak,and at the end of the game we were losing by 2 i was left all alone on 3 1 second before end.I had no mark shot equipped and .... i missed.I just couldnt beleive,my sp5 failed at worst moment.Once with my dg i missed no mark midshot buzzer,and so many missed pullup midshot buzzers(not contested or in the face),and i hv 210 midshot,more then most SFs.How the **** they score better then i do,im gonna burn my account,all sort of people tell me i dont know how to defend,yet im 4 times semi finalist in EU,50 all rounder.SFs are being played by biggest nabs in this game,they keep abusing midshot and 3 shots.this is getting really personal.

Even though I don't have SP5 even my SG will miss wide open shots or buzzer 3s.. missing is going to happen if the game allowed everyone to shoot 100% then it would be boring in some cases.. why would you use pull-up on a mid shot though? Pull up cuts the success rate of your shot regardless of how much mid stat you have.. I would probably never use that skill anymore especially on a guard and for SF would probably be the same since I just don't like that skill.. all that needs to be done really is play every game to where you can manage it without having to take shots that are more high risk

[AnimalPlanet]

. . . .
Some of ya'll smokin' phallus.
Also, no one is giving more scoring assassin potential to a position that can get open easier than any other.

[JimmyButler]

man fk all dat go make c and max his 3pt out then u will be unstoppableh

[Kotumi]

Elite what you just said was so idiotic, do you know the shooting potential of SF for 3pt? I could shoot in your face consistently kid, stop "if a sf is making 3s in your face your defense is just bad". Stop it get some help, SW is has barely any advantage except layup range, other than that SF can do the exact same shit. Stop, talking about slashers, If this was slashing like I could in 2K I would posterize constantly, but I can't do that can I? If anything SW is suppose to be like the play maker position in 2K, SW can dribble well and should be able to hit a good jumper and not be missing wide open occasionally.

[Kotumi]

All I really want is a fucking 3pt focus skill and maybe some more unique skills for SW because Back dribble and scoop layup just arent doing it for me. What SW is, is basically a toned down, worse version of SF that has slightly better long layup :l

[Sanctify]

Elite what you just said was so idiotic, do you know the shooting potential of SF for 3pt? I could shoot in your face consistently kid, stop "if a sf is making 3s in your face your defense is just bad". Stop it get some help, SW is has barely any advantage except layup range, other than that SF can do the exact same shit. Stop, talking about slashers, If this was slashing like I could in 2K I would posterize constantly, but I can't do that can I? If anything SW is suppose to be like the play maker position in 2K, SW can dribble well and should be able to hit a good jumper and not be missing wide open occasionally.

Nastypalms can do that on his SW and I just played with him today

[yiyagiteller]

Sw is a poor man's sf iso build. With cards such difference won't matter.

Back dribble and side step are great scoring skills.

Player is what makes a character well used. If you're good as sw, you'll be fine with sf and vice versa.

[Perse]

I dunno why the DG even got involved in this thread. DG is its own thing, SW is its own, SF is its own...

I also don't know why Swingman IRL needs to equate with SW in FS2... Why are we comparing real life with FS2?

In this game we are all Lebron or Magic Johnson. No matter what position we play.

[Kotumi]

Sanc I can hit 3s consistently because of cards but my point is I can still miss wide open unlike SF. Like yiga said you SW is a poor version of SF. I can dribble really well with SF just as much as I can with SW. Only difference is SF is way more consistent.

[Glow]

Sanc I can hit 3s consistently because of cards but my point is I can still miss wide open unlike SF. Like yiga said you SW is a poor version of SF. I can dribble really well with SF just as much as I can with SW. Only difference is SF is way more consistent.

EVERYBODY MISS WIDE OPEN SHOTS MY SF WITH 200 3pts and +21 success miss wide open sum times...... your making a argument that only SW's miss wide open shots EVERYBODY MISS WIDE OPEN SHOTS AT SUM POINT

[yiyagiteller]

as far as i know, sf and sg are the only ones with +48 3pt success.

if you want sw to shoot like sf, i dont see the point...make sf to shoot well. are you saying you like sw for its speed, layup range, more scoring skills than sf but dislike the fact that it can't shoot as well as sf? isn't this called having a cake and eating it too?

sf with sp5 +12 success misses plenty of open 3s by the way.

as far as i can tell, its a fair trade off between sw and sf.